Quote
"In response to a question from Australian tech site Windows Phone Down Under earlier today, a staffer on the official Zune support account replied that the support page announcing the discontinuation of Zune HD hardware was put up in error. The page has since been taken down. The staffer followed up an hour later with a further affirmation of Microsoft’s commitment to the little music player that could: ”We are still supporting the Zune HD hardware. No official info has been released stating hardware is being discontinued,” the tweet read."

The Zune HD lives…again - Neowin.net: Bahahahaha! 

Quote
"It appears Microsoft has mixed feelings about the Zune. The Redmond giant denied that the Zune was dying earlier today when the device page was taken down from Zune.net, even going as far as stating to the media that the move was a mistake. Now, a page on the Zune support page confirms the Zune HD’s fate, with the company stating “going forward, Windows Phone will be the focus of our mobile music and video strategy, and that we will no longer be producing Zune players."

— When a company sends mixed messages about whether or not a product is discontinued, there are grave problems within the organization.

(Source: neowin.net)

Tags: zune microsoft
Text

Microsoft Math

So, someone at Microsoft apparently had one of these moments and now I’m beginning to see those Zune Pass ads about it costing $30,000 to fill up your iPod everywhere. They have employed a very clever technique to persuade you that you’re wasting money on music when you could just pay $15 a month for music you will never own. It’s called math.

But I have a problem. See, they’re claiming that if you filled up your iPod with music from iTunes it would cost you thirty grand. Which makes sense. Wait, sorry, make that “not at all”—it makes no sense.

The thinking is this: You’ve got a 120 GB iPod. That’s 120,000 megabytes. Now, if by some divine knowledge we say that an average song is 4 minutes long, and if the same divine knowledge says that each minute of music takes about 1 megabyte of space to store it, that’s 4 megabytes (MB from here on out) per song. Dividing 120,000 MB by 4 MB leaves us with 30,000 songs. The iTunes Store is known far and wide for pioneering the $1 a song business model, so therefore, 30,000 songs = 30,000 bucks. And now Microsoft has a whole website dedicated to this fact.

The problem I have with this stems from a very simple fact: the 1 MB per minute principle? Not so much anymore. If you remember correctly, the iTunes Store switched to DRM-free 256 kbps AAC-encoded music a short time ago. From the iPod classic features page, in the fine print, we read:

Music capacity is based on 4 minutes per song and 128-Kbps AAC encoding.

Emphasis in there is mine.

Now that the bitrate of all songs on the iTunes Store has doubled, it’s not hard to say that the size of the “average” song on iTunes has doubled as well. Instead of the average song being 4 MB, it’s now closer to 8 MB. (Maybe a little less since they may be using variable bit rate encoding, but hey, we’re talking Microsoft Math here.)

Therefore, the new, real math would be something more like $15,000 to fill up your iPod at $1 a song. For those not real good with math, that’s half of 30,000, and also, half what Microsoft uses a whole advertising campaign to claim.

All this based on the premise, of course, that:

  1. you actually pay for all your music on a song-by-song basis,
  2. you have nothing else on your iPod besides $1 songs from iTunes, and 
  3. you actually manage to fill up a 120 GB iPod classic… completely with songs from the iTunes Store… bought on a song-by-song basis.

Not to mention that you will actually own these songs forever, of course.