The self-destructive romanticism, the artistic self-consciousness, the frenetically unhinged form, the blend of emotional extravagance and cool self-mocking, the vanished boundaries between irony and sincerity and between symbol and reality, the overt cinematic breakdown and breakup, were all of their moment. Pierrot le fou was the last of Godard’s first films, the herald of even more radical rejections and reconstructions to come—for Godard and for the world around him.
Pierrot le fou: Self-Portrait in a Shattered Lens - From the Current - Buy it while you can. I did.
A 75-minute interview with Stanley Kubrick from 1966. Candid and insightful look at how he got started in photography and filmmaking.
To Cameron, making a movie is going to war, and he is a Spartan general: he comes home carrying his shield or on it. It is a posture that requires a good deal of self-parody. Before beginning production on “The Abyss” (1989), the most ambitious underwater movie ever attempted, he went to see Leonard Goldberg, then the president of Fox, which was financing the film. “He said, ‘I want you to know one thing—once we embark on this adventure and I start to make this movie, the only way you’ll be able to stop me is to kill me,’ ” Goldberg told me. “You looked into those eyes and you knew he meant it.”
James Cameron and “Avatar” : The New Yorker
If you have even the slightest interest in the man who brought us Terminator 2, Aliens, Titantic, and now Avatar, this is an article you must read.
The man has an amazing track record that involves constantly pushing the technological envelope in filmmaking while telling good stories that appeal to mass audiences. Cameron’s not a Godard or a Kubrick by any means, but he is unquestionably an auteur, a filmmaker with a vision, and that’s why I believe if you care about movies or filmmaking, reading this bio piece about him is a must.
On a side note, I kept thinking while I was reading this that Michael Bay must wake up every morning wishing he were as badass as James Cameron.